Onan octa-core processor the core usage bounced between 4 and 8 cores, but with a much lower average core utilization of less than 35%. YouTube - On a quad-core phone only 2 cores were used.Jul 23, 2018 · Octa-core Processors: Octa-core processors use eight cores to perform the assigned task efficiently. Eventually, the octa-core processors render a 200% increase in the overall speed of ProductDescription. Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G3 ACL 21A2002RUS 14″ Notebook - Full HD - 1920 x 1080 - AMD Ryzen 5 5500U Hexa-core (6 Core) 2.10 GHz - 8 GB Total RAM - 256 GB SSD - Mineral Gray.Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G3 ACL, AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (1.80GHz, 4MB) 14.0 1920x1080 Non-Touch, Windows 10 Pro 64, 24.0GB, 1x512GB SSD, M.2 2242, PCIe Gen3x4 NVMe, TLC, AMD Radeon Graphics, QCA6174A AC Itis the cheapest Core i9 CPU and is even faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X which is the top-of-range Ryzen 7 processor from AMD. Intel Core i9-7900X is a Deca-core (10 cores) processor and it comes with 13.75MB cache. The processor has got a base frequency of 3.30 GHz and Maximum Turbo Frequency of 4.30 GHz. Helio X20 Deca core processor (2 x 2GHz Cortex A72 + 4 x 1.9GHz Cortex A53 + 4 x 1 MobilesUnder 10000 - Buy Latest Mobile Phones at Below 10000 on Flipkart Home Mobiles & Accessories Mobiles Music Player Mobiles , Mobiles & Accessories , iOS Mobiles , Octa Core Mobiles , Android Mobiles , HD Recording Mobiles , Smartphones Mobiles , Feature Phones Mobiles , NFC Mobiles Mobile Phones Under Rs.10,000. DockingKeyboard Case for Vastking Kingpad K10 Android 10 Tablet. Vastking KingPad K10 Pro (artist review ). OctaIntel Xeon Platinum 8280L: 2019 Q2: 14 nm: 224: 448: 2.7: 4: 308: 36000: 384: 1640: 84: Octa Intel Xeon Platinum 8275CL: 2019 Q4: 14 nm: 192: 384: 3: 3.9: 286: 8000: 384: 1920: 102: Octa Intel Xeon Platinum 8268: 2019 Q2: 14 nm: 192: 384: 2.9: 3.9: 286: 8000: 384: 1640: 84: 821: 12411: Octa Intel Xeon Platinum 8260: 2019 Q2: 14 nm: 192: 384: 2.4: 3.9: 286: 8000: 384: 1320: 90: Octa Intel Xeon Platinum 8171M: 2017 Q3: 14 nm+: 208: 416: 2.6: 2.6: 286: 12288 Insimple mathematical terms, octa-core processors are those that come with 8 cores and hexa-core processors are those processors that have 6 cores in them. Explanation: sab log spam kar te hai DECAInc. is committed to creating and maintaining a healthy and respectful environment for all of our emerging leaders and entrepreneurs. Our philosophy is to ensure all members, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, or socio-economic status are treated equally and respectfully.. "/> TheVastking Kingpad M10 Android Tablet is a budget Android tablet with an IPS laminated display for better viewing experience than most other tablets in the price range. This particular package they sent for review also includes a keyboard + touchpad case. At this price , the Vastking Kingpad >M10 Android tablet exceeded my expectations. Heyguys..😎😎In this video i explain what is dual core , quad core , hexa core, octa core, deca core processorDeca core is latest in the marketDeca core fas JualAlldocube Iplay 20 Case Terbaru - May 2022 ,大切な タブレット- Alldocube iPlay 20P - www.mobinspire.com,Jual ALLDOCUBE IPlay 20S 20P 10.1,Amazon.co.jp: TRkin. . Theocta-core processor can get through this faster than the quad-core processor of comparable items. Octa-core processor is at some point faster than any of those core processor listed above. Deca-core processor. As double core processor are comprised of 2 cores, quad-core with 4 cores, hexacore with 6 cores and octa-core processor with 8 cores. OEMLenovo Thinkcentre V50S SFF Octa Core (8 Cores) I7-10700, 32GB RAM, 512GB Nv | eBay People who viewed this item also viewed Showing Slide 1 of 1 Dell Precision 3640 Tower i9-10900 2.8GHz 64GB 500GB SSD AMD Radeon Win11Pro $860.00 + $24.99 shipping Dell OptiPlex 7040 SFF Desktop, i5 6500, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, Win10 $174.99 Free shipping.Lenovo ePac On-site Repair - Contrat de maintenance OEMLenovo ThinkCentre V50s SFF Intel Hexa Core i5-10500 [6 Cores], 16GB RAM, 256GB NVMe, W10P, Business Desktop Computer. View on Amazon. OEM Lenovo ThinkPad T490 Laptop 14" FHD IPS Display 1920x1080, Intel Quad Core i5-8365U, 16GB RAM, 256GB NVMe, Fingerprint, W10P. metal 2 car garage. avantree d4169 dual bluetooth 50 Whatthis means in simpler terms is that a quad-core phone will spread the load to all of its four cores, and an octa-core phone will also spread the load over all eight cores. hey guys..😎😎 in this video i explain what is dual core, quad core, hexa core, octa core, deca core processor deca core is latest in the market deca core faster fzPy. The smartphone market becomes more competitive each year with manufacturers attempting to outdo each other on power, speed and battery life. More and more phones have octa-core processors, but are they better than quad-core and dual-core phones? We explain what you need to know about smartphone processor arms race between AMD and Intel has been hotting up since the early 2000s with the releases of the Athlon 64 and Intel’s Core 2 Duo back in 2005 and 2006 the years have gone by we’ve seen progression in not only the speed of each core, but the amount of cores on each physical chip. The latest high-end consumer processors contain up to 8 cores, although they are still much more powerful than those found in vs quad-core vs dual-core Smartphone processorsIn smartphones we’ve seen a similar progression, with quite a few phones boasting octa-core chips. Smartphones have rapidly caught up to computer processors with their core count, but why has this happened so quickly?The answer, in short, is a demand for better battery phones use ARM processors, and while it is – relatively speaking – fairly easy to put a powerful quad-core processor in the latest phone, battery technology isn’t really up to the job of keeping that processor along with the screen, modem, GPS and other components fed with power all day also Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 specs and featuresSo ARM developed what is effectively a dual quad-core processor a single chip with two sets of four cores able to share the same cache memory. It calls this set of cores can deliver high performance when required at the expense of high power drain, and the other set delivers a lower level of performance but also requires much less battery power. Usually, only one set of cores is used at one time, so for all practical purposes it’s really a quad-core low power’ cores are used for most of the time, including for tasks such as reading and sending email, navigating around the operating system, and also browsing the web. But when more power is needed, such as for intensive games or editing photos or video, the chip dynamically switches to the faster quartet of far, the only octa-core processors we’ve seen have been in Android phones, from manufacturers including Qualcomm, Samsung, MediaTek and a long time, Apple stuck with dual-core processors in the iPhone, and it was only in the iPhone 7 that it made the move to quad-core. But as with octa-core processors, the A10 Fusion chip actually uses a pair of dual-core chips, one high-performance pair and one energy efficient approach doesn’t always mean there are equal numbers of high- and low-performance cores. Some phones have hexa-core processors, which typically employ a pair of powerful cores, and four power-efficient cores. There are even octa-core chips which have eight low-power cores, such as the Qualcomm Snapdragon vs quad-core vs dual-core PerformanceCompare benchmarks, as you can in our smartphone charts, and you’ll see that an octa-core processor is not twice as fast as a quad-core. And given what you now know about the design of the chips, you wouldn’t expect them to the same with the iPhone 7 it’s not twice as quick as the iPhone 6s. The fact it’s 40 percent or so quicker is impressive, but that’s mainly down to the improvements made in the high-performance pair of cores, not because there are twice as many of particularly impressive is the way that iPhones have beaten or matched the best Android phones with – often – half as many forget that the main processor isn’t responsible for graphics performance. To a large extent this is down to the GPU – graphics processing unit. This is the biggest factor in determining how well games run on a phone, but the screen resolution must also be taken into account. You can see in this diagram that the CPU is only one of many components on a modern smartphone processor, which is called a SoC main point here is that a phone with an octa-core processor isn’t necessarily going to be a better choice for playing games. It may not even be a better choice for CPU-intensive apps, and this is why it’s important to read reviews and look at benchmark results if this kind of performance is important to you when choosing a course, we’re talking about processors and performance at a very high level here. Overall performance includes many more factors such as the size and speed of the on-board cache, the amount and type of RAM and the software being used. The latter is especially important, since apps need to be written to use all the available processing cores. This is all beyond the scope of this article, however. Suffice to say that Android – and iOS – are optimised for multi-core processors as are modern vs quad-core vs dual-core which is best?So let’s get to the main question. Is it best to buy a phone with the most cores you can get? Not have tested the performance of many, many phones, and there is no evidence that more cores equals better performance. As we said above, the extra cores are often there for efficiency and simply knowing the number of cores tells you nothing about the architecture of the CPU and how many of those cores are high it doesn’t really make sense to buy a phone based on its core count, just as you wouldn’t buy a car purely because of the number of cylinders in its engine there’s far, far more to if you are looking for a phone upgrade, be sure to check our round-up of the best phones to buy. Um processador multinúcleo ou multi core, em inglês é aquele que tem dois dual ou mais núcleos quad, hexa, octa, deca-core… de processamento dentro de um chip. Isso quer dizer que os smartphones possuem dois ou mais núcleos responsáveis por dividir as tarefas. Em processadores de um só núcleo também é possível executar várias funções ao mesmo tempo. Porém, elas podem chegar ao limite da capacidade da CPU Unidade Central de Processamento com um desempenho que vai deixar a desejar. Como funciona um processador? Parece bem óbvio, mas os processadores processam um monte de dados solicitados pelos aplicativos que você usa. Para abrir navegadores, mensageiros e jogos, o processador precisa acessar o armazenamento interno e encontrar os dados referentes ao app, levá-los até a memória RAM e trabalhar nesta troca até exibir tudo na tela. É o processador que também vai receber as informações que você mesmo cria no teclado e enviá-las ao aplicativo, num vai e vem de dados. A memória RAM, como já falamos aqui antes, tem a missão de permitir que o processador tenha acesso imediato aos dados que deseja como um meio do caminho, contribuindo para uma maior rapidez e capacidade de resposta. Quando o processador precisa fazer alguma coisa de novo, consulta dados da memória RAM. O que significa core? Como você já pode imaginar, um processador dual-core trabalha com dois núcleos, um quad-core com quatro, um hexa com seis e assim por diante… Um bom processador oferece melhor desempenho ao smartphone para que consiga realizar suas tarefas sem comprometer a performance — evitando travamento, lentidão e outras intempéries. O sistema operacional do celular, no caso do Android, por exemplo, trata cada um desses núcleos como um processador diferente. Na maioria dos casos, cada unidade possui seu próprio cache. Contudo, os dois núcleos ou mais não se somam em capacidade de processamento, o que eles fazem é dividir as demandas, tornando-as mais fáceis e rápidas. Um processador dual-core com clock de GHz não equivale, por exemplo, a um processador single-core com clock de Ghz o dobro, e sim a dois núcleos GHz operando em paralelo. Quanto maior o clock calculado em GHz melhor será o seu desempenho para executar diversos programas simultaneamente sem engasgos. Como já deve ter notado, uma série de características influenciam no desempenho do processador. O que conhecemos como “velocidade” clock é o número seguido de GHz. O que é clock? Podemos definir o clock como o volume de ações escrever e ler dados ou executar comandos que o processador pode executar por segundo. Sendo os GHz um indicador imediato da “velocidade”. Quanto mais “pulsos de clock”, mais rápida a frequência. Isso tornou-se necessário para resfriar processadores single-core com frequências cada vez mais altas em GHz e que amontoavam uma concentração cada vez maior de transistores — com o passar do tempo cada vez menores — no mesmo circuito integrado. Fazendo uma analogia bem superficial, um núcleo é um motor. Então, é natural imaginar que um deca-core com dez núcleos é o melhor para um processador rápido e potente. Entretanto, um desempenho impecável depende do motor, depende do tipo de carga que precisa levar e depende também da sua rotina de uso e esforço do motor. Quanto mais núcleos, melhor o celular? Observar só o clock não basta. Há limites para quão rápido pode ser um processador que cabe dentro de um smartphone que cabe na sua mão sem que esquente demais. A solução encontrada pelas fabricantes foi fazer chips de processadores móveis com mais de um núcleo, que funcionam como se fosse um processador independente. Assim, o número total de ações que consegue realizar por “pulso de clock” é maior. 1 o fator software 👩🏾‍💻 Os fabricantes podem fazer com que processadores usem cada núcleo para determinadas tarefas e isso permite, por exemplo, ter uma melhor autonomia de energia usando os núcleos mais lentos para tarefas simples e os núcleos mais rápidos e poderoso para tarefas complexas. É o processador que vai organizar e definir quais processos serão executados em qual dos núcleos — é comum que haja uma combinação com velocidades diferentes. É possível, ainda, que o próprio aplicativo ofereça configurações para otimizar os processos. Sendo assim, ter um processador com muitos núcleos não implica ganho velocidade substancial, pois o sistema operacional ou aplicativos podem não usar recursos com maestria. 2 a memória de cache ⏳ Aliada à memória RAM, o processador tem ainda o que chamamos de memória de cache, um pequeno espaço de armazenamento de dados absurdamente rápido que fica no próprio chip para guardar dados que precisam ser acessados com muita frequência. A forma como essa pequena memória de cache é dividida entre os núcleos do processador varia bastante em cerca de três níveis L1, L2 e L3, sendo o L1 é o mais rápido e isso pode influenciar no resultado final do desempenho de um processador mesmo com muitos núcleos anunciados em propaganda, porém subutilizados. Como avaliar o processador de um smartphone? Certamente que você vai continuar observando a velocidade em GHz na ficha técnica dos celulares, mas deve levar em consideração que comparar processadores é muito mais do que avaliar “quem tem clock maior”. De acordo com a arquitetura adotada pela fabricante isto é, a maneira como o chip é construído, seu desempenho pode variar. E, lógico, como você não é um especialista nisso, não precisa se agarrar a quesitos tão técnicos ou se aprofundar na questão da memória de cache ou de como suas aplicações trabalham com os núcleos de um processador. É para isso que existem “benchmarks”. Como isso funciona? Análise técnicas simulam o desempenho de um ou mais chips em situações leves e severas. Ao final, cada um dos processadores recebe uma pontuação com base no seu desempenho. Se você estiver em dúvida entre dois smartphones com processadores de fabricantes diferentes, por exemplo, a melhor coisa é consultar pontuações em testes. O Tecnoblog costuma divulgar comparativos entre os melhores celulares e que usam processadores com arquiteturas completamente diferentes como a Apple e a Samsung. Um bom exemplo é o comparativo entre o A10 Fusion — o primeiro chip com CPU quad-core a equipar um iPhone — com o Snapdragon 845, um chip octa-core da Qualcomm. Conforme a pontuação do Geekbench, o processador do velho iPhone 7 e iPhone 7 Plus se sai melhor que o rival presente em Androids de Sony, Xiaomi, Samsung e LG, incluindo a linha Google Pixel 3. Para deixar um pouco mais complicado, você ainda tem processadores Exynos, da Samsung, em algumas versões de aparelhos. Outro exemplo de que total em núcleos não é documento é o A12 Bionic, da Apple, que é hexa-core. Comparado ao mesmo Snapdragon 845, da Qualcomm, o A12 tem reconhecidamente mais desempenho bruto, independente de otimizações de software. Um terceiro exemplo é o Exynos 9810, um octa-core de GHz, da Samsung em comparação com o Snapdragon 805, um quad-core de 2,65 GHz, da Qualcomm. Em tese, o modelo da Qualcomm tem maior velocidade em GHz, mas era um pesadelo para os usuários pois esquentava absurdamente, revelando desempenho insatisfatório e deixando o chip de oito núcleos da sul-coreana com menor frequência em vantagem. Vale notar que, em geral, as análises só levam em consideração o desempenho do processador sozinho e não o conjunto do smartphone por completo. Uma memória RAM lenta, uma memória flash lenta ou um software mal otimizado, podem botar tudo a perder mesmo em um celular equipado com processador de vários núcleos. Sendo assim, fica a dica veja comparativos técnicos, GHz não é tudo, há mais nisso aí. Androidocta-coreProcessador multinúcleoQuad-coreinglêsCPUiPhoneQualcommSamsungiPhone 7 PlusiPhone 7AppleApple A10 FusionLG ElectronicsXiaomiSonyExynos When purchasing a new laptop or building a computer, the processor is the most important decision. But there's a lot of jargon, especially the cores. For example, do you need a dual-core processor, a quad-core, a hexacore, an octa-core, or more? Let's cut the jargon and understand what it all really means. Dual-Core vs. Quad-Core, Explained Here's everything you need to know There is always only one processor chip. That chip can have one, two, four, six, eight, ten, twelve, or even sixteen cores. So if you find a "single core" CPU, that means the processor chip has one core. And a dual-core processor has two cores, a quad-core has four, a hexa-core has six, an octa-core has eight, and so on. Currently, an 18-core processor is the best you can get in consumer PCs. I mean, you could buy a 64-core AMD Threadripper, which is available to consumers, but that's more processing power than most regular consumers could think of using. Each "core" is the part of the chip that does the processing work. Essentially, each core is a central processing unit CPU. This article deals with dual-core vs. quad-core processors for computers, not for smartphones. We have a separate post on understanding smartphone cores. The Difference Between Dual-Core and Quad-Core CPUs You might think more cores will make your processor faster overall, but that's not always the case. It's a little more complicated than that. More cores are faster only if a program can split its tasks between the cores. Not all programs are developed to split tasks between cores. More on this later. Each core's clock speed is also a crucial factor in speed, as is the architecture. A newer dual-core CPU with a higher clock speed will often outperform an older quad-core CPU with a lower clock speed. Power Consumption More cores also lead to higher power consumption by the processor. When the processor is switched on, it supplies power to all the cores, not just one at a time. Chip makers have been trying to reduce power consumption and make processors more energy efficient. But as a general rule of thumb, a quad-core processor will draw more power from your laptop and thus make it run out of battery faster. More Cores Equal More Heat More factors than the core affect the heat generated by a processor. But again, as a general rule, more cores lead to more heat. Due to this additional heat, manufacturers need to add better heat sinks or other cooling solutions. Are Quad-Core CPUs More Expensive Than Dual-Core? More cores isn't always a higher price. Like we said earlier, clock speed, architecture versions, and other considerations come into play. But if all other factors are the same, then more cores will fetch a higher price. Software Optimization for CPU Cores Here's the dirty little secret that chip manufacturers don't want you to know. It's not always about how many cores you are running; it's about what software you are running on them. Programs have to be specifically developed to take advantage of multiple processors. In the past, "multi-threaded software" wasn't as common, although as it's near-impossible to buy a single-core CPU these days, this issue isn't once what it was. However, it's important to note that even if it's a multi-threaded program, it's also about what it is used for. For example, the Google Chrome web browser supports multiple processes, as does video editing software Adobe Premiere Pro. Adobe Premiere Pro instructs different cores to work on different aspects of your edit. Considering the many layers involved in video editing, this makes sense, as each core can work on a separate task. Similarly, Google Chrome instructs different cores to work on different tabs. But herein lies the problem. Once you open a web page in a tab, it is usually static after that. There is no further processing work needed; the rest of the work is about storing the page in the RAM. This means even though the core can be used for a background tab, it is unnecessary. This Google Chrome example is an illustration of how even multi-threaded software might not give you much of a real-world performance boost. Double the Cores Is Not Double the Speed So let's say you have the right software and all your other hardware is the same. Would a quad-core processor then be twice as fast as a dual-core processor? Nope. Increasing cores does not address the software problem of scaling. Scaling to cores is the theoretical ability of any software to assign the right tasks to the right cores, so each core is computing at its optimal speed. That's not what happens in reality. In reality, tasks are split sequentially which most multi-threaded software does or randomly. For example, let's say you have a quad-core processor Core1, Core2, Core3, Core4. You need to accomplish three tasks T1, T2, T3 to finish an action, and you have five actions A1, A2, A3, A4, A5 like this. Here's how the software will divide tasks Core1 = A1T1 Core2 = A1T2 Core3 = A1T3 Core4 = A2T1 The software is not smart, though. If A1T3 is the hardest and longest task, the software should have split A1T3 between Core3 and Core4. But now, even after Core1 and Core2 finish their tasks, they have to wait for the slower Core3's task to complete the action. All of this is a roundabout way of saying that not all software is optimized to take full advantage of multiple cores. And doubling the cores does not always equal doubling the speeds. Where Do More Cores Really Help? Now that you know what cores do and their restrictions in boosting performance, you must be asking yourself, "Do I need more cores?" Well, it depends on what you plan to do with them. Dual-Core and Quad-Core in Gaming If you fancy yourself to be a gamer, then get more cores on a gaming PC. The vast majority of new AAA titles popular games from big studios support multi-threaded architecture. Video games are still largely dependent on the graphics card to look good, but a multi-core processor helps too. Editing Videos or Audio For any professional who works with video or audio programs, more cores will be beneficial. Most of the popular audio and video editing tools take advantage of multi-threaded processing. Photoshop and Design If you're a designer, a higher clock speed and more processor cache will increase speeds better than more cores. Even the most popular design software, Adobe Photoshop, largely supports single-threaded or lightly threaded processes. Multiple cores aren't going to be a significant boost with this. Should You Get More Cores? Overall, a quad-core processor is going to perform faster than a dual-core processor for general computing. Each program you open will work on its own core, so if the tasks are shared, the speeds are better. If you use a lot of programs simultaneously, switch between them often, and assign them their own tasks, then get a processor with more cores. Just know this overall system performance is one area where far too many factors come into play. Don't expect a magical boost by changing one component like the processor. Choose wisely and buy the right processor for your needs. You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites should upgrade or use an alternative browser. 1 Hey guys, if I'm looking forward to buy a cpu with a hefty budget to spend, what processor should I buy? An octa core or a hexa core one considering that I don't want to upgrade cpu again for atleast 5-6 years Alpha3031 Apr 9, 2015 Form Please fill. Nov 27, 2013 2,902 0 13,460 2 Form Please fill. 3 I said "if" Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 4 If it were me the minimum core count for an intel CPU would be 6 cores if your wanting 5+ years out of it, 8 would be better. I would also plan on overclocking to squeeze more performance from my CPU over time. Ex. I got a i7 3930k 3 years ago. i initially overclocked it to January made some new OC profiles stable up to maybe but it needs more testing still to be sure. It allows me to get more from my cpu over time. Yeah i could have cranked up the core speed from the get go but i would not have seen the benefits later as it would have already felt like the norm, plus when you OC you wear things out faster so there is that to consider in the parts longevity. Sep 30, 2012 1,269 1 11,960 5 You kinda answered your own question. You'll obviously want to buy the absolute best you can afford if you want maximum longevity, and right now with x99, the choice is even more clear-cut than with previous x79 setups since with the current lineup, the top-end i7 has more cores than the model down. Nov 27, 2013 2,902 0 13,460 6 [quotemsg=15647161,0,1935761]I said "if" [/quotemsg] Well, if we have no idea what you're going to do with it, how are we supposed to make suggestions? For all we know, you could want the CPU to surf the web with. Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 7 [quotemsg=15647180,0,936635]You kinda answered your own question. You'll obviously want to buy the absolute best you can afford if you want maximum longevity, and right now with x99, the choice is even more clear-cut than with previous x79 setups since with the current lineup, the top-end i7 has more cores than the model down.[/quotemsg] kinda true 8 it depends, we talking 6300 or 9590? or 5820k or 5960x 9 Intel only. 5820k/5930k and 5960x 10 This thread is under PC gaming category. So obviously I am a gamer. And I am confused because some hexa cores outperform the 5960x in benchmarks Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 11 [quotemsg=15648418,0,1935761]This thread is under PC gaming category. So obviously I am a gamer. And I am confused because some hexa cores outperform the 5960x in benchmarks[/quotemsg] while true for the moment heck some quad core's out perform hexa cores as well...clock speed, architecture make a difference. That said with consoles having 8 core CPU's and multi-core/ multi-thread CPUs in PC becoming common place. In the next few years 8 cores/threads+ could well be the new gold standard. The Op was wanting something for 5+ years so it's reasonable to think two more cores will be useful in that time frame instead of just six. 12 [quotemsg=15648418,0,1935761]This thread is under PC gaming category. So obviously I am a gamer. And I am confused because some hexa cores outperform the 5960x in benchmarks[/quotemsg] Because the 5960x isnt meant for gaming.... hence its low stock clock speed. The 4790k is the best gaming CPU out right now. The extreme series Haswell-e is for enthusiast builders, video editors, servers.. etc not gamers. Go with the 4790k and you should be gold for about 4-5 years. Nov 27, 2013 2,902 0 13,460 13 I'd go 5820K and custom liquid cooling. Plenty of space for 3/4 GPU setups. you'll need a full tower case too. Though it does depend on what games you play. Some games still only use one or two cores. Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 14 [quotemsg=15648940,0,1493684]I'd go 5820K and custom liquid cooling. Plenty of space for 3/4 GPU setups. you'll need a full tower case too. Though it does depend on what games you play. Some games still only use one or two cores.[/quotemsg] yeah i have to disagree with the 3 to 4 GPU part...the 5820k only has 20 PCIe lanes...good for dual GPU or single GPU and an SSD but not both, there are just not enough PCIe lanes to handle it. In fact many Mobo manufacturers warn users of this in their Mobo website/users manuals online. That is exactly why there is a 5830k with 40 PCIe lanes to handle that kind of bandwidth. Not to say the 5820k is a bad CPU but one needs to be aware of it's strengths and weaknesses before making a choice. And yes i have seen all the charts showing the "minimal" loss in frames even when dropping a GPU to PCIe 4x but if your spending the kind of money one is spending on a Extreme Series MOBO and CPU it hardly makes sense to kneecap your gaming performance even if ever so slightly for the get go. Call me crazy. Oct 19, 2007 3,226 6 21,415 15 Wait till DX12 comes out. It "might" be a game changer in terms of number of cores in a cpu. Its a rather smart move to wait and see roudups in games and other software on dx12. Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 16 [quotemsg=15649243,0,151198]Wait till DX12 comes out. It "might" be a game changer in terms of number of cores in a cpu. Its a rather smart move to wait and see roudups in games and other software on dx12.[/quotemsg] yeah something to be said for that...down side though even with windows 10 launching this summer it will probably be 2016 before we see DX12 games or very many of them at least. So you could wait and if you can it might be worth it but generally speaking i buy whats available and best today...not tomorrow. The future is always uncertain and computers change at break neck pace. Though it's slowing, if you ask me, on the CPU side...sandy bridge to ivy bridge to haswell....the gains are minimal performance wise and in some cases a back step though power efficiency is much better with the newer generations. Sadly efficiency seems to be the focus not pure performance anymore. 17 I was thinking about buying the best octa core processor by this fall in time for black froday sales along wuth a dual gpu probably 980Ti which would be launched by then. Can a mid tower cabinet with asus x99-a support that? Nov 27, 2013 2,902 0 13,460 18 [quotemsg=15649095,0,146991]yeah i have to disagree with the 3 to 4 GPU part...the 5820k only has 20 PCIe lanes...good for dual GPU or single GPU and an SSD but not both, there are just not enough PCIe lanes to handle it. In fact many Mobo manufacturers warn users of this in their Mobo website/users manuals online. That is exactly why there is a 5830k with 40 PCIe lanes to handle that kind of bandwidth. Not to say the 5820k is a bad CPU but one needs to be aware of it's strengths and weaknesses before making a choice. And yes i have seen all the charts showing the "minimal" loss in frames even when dropping a GPU to PCIe 4x but if your spending the kind of money one is spending on a Extreme Series MOBO and CPU it hardly makes sense to kneecap your gaming performance even if ever so slightly for the get go. Call me crazy. [/quotemsg] I probably should have added something to my post that said I was sleepy and not to take me seriously. Still, some boards do have PCI-E lane multiplier thingamajigs. 5820K for 2 GPU, 5930K for 3 GPU. though if you get the dual GPU cards... Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 19 [quotemsg=15653911,0,1493684][quotemsg=15649095,0,146991]yeah i have to disagree with the 3 to 4 GPU part...the 5820k only has 20 PCIe lanes...good for dual GPU or single GPU and an SSD but not both, there are just not enough PCIe lanes to handle it. In fact many Mobo manufacturers warn users of this in their Mobo website/users manuals online. That is exactly why there is a 5830k with 40 PCIe lanes to handle that kind of bandwidth. Not to say the 5820k is a bad CPU but one needs to be aware of it's strengths and weaknesses before making a choice. And yes i have seen all the charts showing the "minimal" loss in frames even when dropping a GPU to PCIe 4x but if your spending the kind of money one is spending on a Extreme Series MOBO and CPU it hardly makes sense to kneecap your gaming performance even if ever so slightly for the get go. Call me crazy. [/quotemsg] I probably should have added something to my post that said I was sleepy and not to take me seriously. Still, some boards do have PCI-E lane multiplier thingamajigs. 5820K for 2 GPU, 5930K for 3 GPU. though if you get the dual GPU cards...[/quotemsg] LOL been there brother...yeah you can get a multiplier as mentioned on some motherboards but it adds latency and is generally not the best option IMO. Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 21 [quotemsg=15654560,0,1935761]5820k can run sli? [/quotemsg] yes but its best suited for dual card or single GPU with an SSD. thats what we were talking about. if you want to do three or four GPUs..or even a dual GPU with an SSD which uses 4 PCIe lanes, then it becomes less ideal and you want the i7 5930k for the greater PCIe lanes it has. 22 pointless to use more than a 2 way sli. If I go for a haswell e cpu, I will have to keep x99. But I'm afraid I will have to upgrade my gpu in few years to next gen, nvlink stuff. Will my x99 support that? Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 23 [quotemsg=15654811,0,1935761]pointless to use more than a 2 way sli. If I go for a haswell e cpu, I will have to keep x99. But I'm afraid I will have to upgrade my gpu in few years to next gen, nvlink stuff. Will my x99 support that? [/quotemsg] Yes and no. i run dual gpu plus a card for physx 3 GPUs and there for I need the PCIe lanes, one reason i have a i7 3930k compared to a quad core, that and i do a lot of video encoding...i have enough physx games in my library a dedicated physx is worth it for me. As for the NVlink i believe that come with pascal and there are no motherboards with that slot yet on the market. So its out of reach for now. 24 So should I go for cheaper 4790k and z97 extreme then? With 970 sli as I don't do anything else other than gaming. That should last me 4 or 5 years maybe. Jan 9, 2015 1,072 0 19,660 25 Honestly we have the 2 most exciting games in the last few years, coming next 2 month. This fact already worth to build a PC to play them on ultra. I think you shoudln'T worry about beeing future proof for 5-6 years, because it is impossible to do so. If you understand the Moore law in electronics, you'll already know why. Both Intel and nvidia's new architectures are in the gate. And actually if you own an expensive PC you can sell it whenever you want and rebuild from scratch. Especially with active warranty on the parts. The main decision you should make if you want to play in 4k or 1080p. - For 1080p a z97,i7 4790k and a single gtx 980 is the best choice. it maxes all games with 60fps+. Then when new architectures hit, you sell rebuild, simple as that. - For 4k gaming x99, i7 5930k, single or sli titan-x is the only smart choice. Note that people will tell things like 970 sli and 980 sli is good enough for 4k or 1440p, but they are wrong in both cases. The reason for this is the texture size that modern games use. the 970 is not even a choice for 1440p because of 3,5gb vram limitation. most of modern games are optimized to run on ultra on a 4gb card on 1080p resolution. With the titan-x and the 6core you would be a bit more future proof, but it's still not worth to wait the warranty to end, so you are in the same boat. For now, i'd advice to go 1080p and z97, single 980 with i7 4790 or 4790k, except if you have tons of disposable cash and you really want to go 4k now. Similar threads Advertising Cookies Policies Privacy Term & Conditions

hexa core vs octa core